Posted on May 6, 2011 by Stuart Simington
Court confirms that council fees may exceed actual costs
The Court has confirmed that councils may charge fees for service that exceed the council’s costs of providing the service.
Meriton Apartments argued that Sydney City Council could not charge more than its actual or direct costs of providing on-street work zones but Pepper J rejected that argument: Meriton Apartments Pty Limited v Council of the City of Sydney (No 3) [2011] NSWLEC 65.
The decision is an orthodox interpretation of s610D(2) of the Local Government Act 1993 which makes it clear that ‘[t]he cost to the council of providing a service in connection with the exercise of a regulatory function need not be the only basis for determining the approved fee for that service‘.
Pepper J accepted that fees could take account of factors such as the indirect cost to the council of providing the service and the cost to the community.
Pepper J also rejected the argument that this was inconsistent with the Council’s charter, in particular ‘to raise funds for local purposes by the fair imposition of rates, charges and fees‘.
Leave a comment
in focus comments policy
LTL welcomes your feedback and comments on our posts. all comments, however, will be moderated and we reserve the right not to publish any comment for any reason.
LTL in focus is primarily designed for public sector and development professionals dealing in the fields of planning, environment and government. you may, therefore, wish to consult your organisation’s social media policy before you post any comments. it should go without saying that we expect all comments to maintain a level of respect and professional courtesy.
Please note we are unable to provide specific legal advice via these comments. If you wish to engage us to provide legal advice on a matter, please contact our office directly.
In making a comment you are required to provide your email address, this will not be published on the site. if the moderator chooses to publish your comment, the name you provide will be published with your comment – it is your choice whether you provide your full name or just your first name. if you provide your full name, we may seek to verify your identity prior to publication of your first comment. If you wish your comment to be directed only to the author or moderator please make that clear – marking it NFP or Not For Publication is the easiest way. thank you for your support and happy reading – matthew mcnamara, ceo.