Posted on February 10, 2012 by Megan Hawley
2
‘Paper subdivisions’ – A step closer
The Planning Minister today issued a media release regarding ‘paper subdivisions’. This follows on from the release for comment of draft amendments to the Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000 (EPA Reg) dealing with ‘paper subdivisions’.
‘Paper subdivisions’ are not defined in the proposed amendments to the EPA Reg, but supporting documents indicate that the phrase refers to areas of the state which cannot be effectively developed due to a combination of a lack of infrastructure, lot configuration resulting from an historic subdivision, and multiple land owners.
The Environmental Planning & Assessment Amendment Act 2008 included a proposed amendment to the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) to overcome the difficulties in developing such land. However, that amendment has never commenced operation.
The content of the draft amendment to the EPA Reg is not, of itself significant. However, it brings the commencement of the amendments to the EPA Act a step closer.
The proposed amendments to the EPA Act are significant.
They enable the Minister to make a subdivision order in respect of land if a development plan for that land has been prepared by a relevant authority and more than 60% of the owners of the land agree to the proposal for the development of the land. The Minister must consider it desirable to do so to promote the orderly and economic use and development of the land.
However, interestingly, given that the purpose of the provisions was to address situations where there are multiple landowners, and difficulties associated with co-ordinating those owners, an order could be made in respect of an area of land held by only two owners. The legislation will therefore, potentially, have very broad application.
If a subdivision order is made, the relevant authority, which may or may not be the local council, can be given additional powers including:
- the power to compulsorily acquire any of the subdivision land;
- the power to levy development contributions and enter into agreements to fund subdivision works;
- broad powers of entry onto the land; and
- powers to carry out subdivision works.
Significantly, and to enable land acquisitions to occur in return for providing infrastructure, or to enable land trading, the development plan for subdivision land can specify that land can be acquired for compensation other than monetary compensation, and that certain provisions of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 do not apply.
Once the amendments to the EPA Act are made, it will be interesting to note the circumstances in which the provisions are used, and the manner in which the broad powers which can be conferred on relevant authorities are exercised.
Leave a comment
in focus comments policy
LTL welcomes your feedback and comments on our posts. all comments, however, will be moderated and we reserve the right not to publish any comment for any reason.
LTL in focus is primarily designed for public sector and development professionals dealing in the fields of planning, environment and government. you may, therefore, wish to consult your organisation’s social media policy before you post any comments. it should go without saying that we expect all comments to maintain a level of respect and professional courtesy.
Please note we are unable to provide specific legal advice via these comments. If you wish to engage us to provide legal advice on a matter, please contact our office directly.
In making a comment you are required to provide your email address, this will not be published on the site. if the moderator chooses to publish your comment, the name you provide will be published with your comment – it is your choice whether you provide your full name or just your first name. if you provide your full name, we may seek to verify your identity prior to publication of your first comment. If you wish your comment to be directed only to the author or moderator please make that clear – marking it NFP or Not For Publication is the easiest way. thank you for your support and happy reading – matthew mcnamara, ceo.